翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Association for Jewish Theatre ・ Association for Joint Cultivation of Land ・ Association for Justice and Equality ・ Association des Scouts de Djibouti ・ Association des Scouts du Burundi ・ Association des Scouts du Canada ・ Association des Scouts du Niger ・ Association des Scouts du Rwanda ・ Association des Scouts et Guides de Mauritanie ・ Association des Scouts et Guides du Congo ・ Association des Scouts et Guides du Sénégal ・ Association des Veuves du Genocide ・ Association des Écrivains et Artistes Révolutionnaires ・ Association des États Généraux des Étudiants de l'Europe ・ Association Electronique Libre ・ Association fallacy ・ Association fiber ・ Association football ・ Association football and politics ・ Association football at the 1956 Summer Olympics ・ Association football at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification ・ Association football at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads ・ Association football club names ・ Association football contracts ・ Association football culture ・ Association football during World War I ・ Association football during World War II ・ Association football headgear ・ Association football in America ・ Association football in American Samoa Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Association fallacy ： ウィキペディア英語版 Association fallacy An association fallacy is an inductive informal fallacy of the type hasty generalization or red herring which asserts that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another, merely by an irrelevant association. The two types are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association. Association fallacies are a special case of red herring, and can be based on an appeal to emotion. == Form == In notation of first-order logic, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃''x'' ∈ ''S'' : ''φ''(''x'')) → (∀''x'' ∈ ''S'' : ''φ''(''x'')), meaning "if there exists any ''x'' in the set ''S'' so that a property ''φ'' is true for ''x'', then for all ''x'' in ''S'' the property ''φ'' must be true." :Premise A is a B :Premise A is also a C :Conclusion Therefore, all Bs are Cs The fallacy in the argument can be illustrated through the use of an Euler diagram: "A" satisfies the requirement that it is part of both sets "B" and "C", but if one represents this as an Euler diagram, it can clearly be seen that it is possible that a part of set "B" is ''not'' part of set "C", refuting the conclusion that "all Bs are Cs". 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Association fallacy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.